{"id":1104,"date":"2023-08-31T15:16:48","date_gmt":"2023-08-31T07:16:48","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.endlesswiresaw.com\/?p=1104"},"modified":"2026-09-07T17:14:04","modified_gmt":"2026-09-07T09:14:04","slug":"%ec%9b%90%ed%98%95-%eb%8b%a4%ec%9d%b4%ec%95%84%eb%aa%ac%eb%93%9c-%ec%99%80%ec%9d%b4%ec%96%b4-%ec%bb%a4%ed%8c%85-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.endlesswiresaw.com\/ko\/circular-diamond-wire-cutting-2\/","title":{"rendered":"\uc6d0\ud615 \ub2e4\uc774\uc544\ubaac\ub4dc \uc640\uc774\uc5b4 \uc808\ub2e8 \ube44\uc6a9: \ub2e8\uc704 \ube44\uc6a9 \ubc0f ROI \uac00\uc774\ub4dc"},"content":{"rendered":"

Circular diamond wire cutting cost should be evaluated per accepted part, not by machine price or cutting time alone. A useful calculation includes wire consumption, machine time, operator time, coolant or dust control, kerf-related material loss, inspection, rework and scrap. These inputs can change substantially with material grade, workpiece size and the required surface or edge quality.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

This guide provides a cost and ROI framework for continuous-loop abrasive wire processes. It does not publish a universal price, wire-life claim or savings percentage. Equipment and wire selection should follow a representative test using the actual workpiece and acceptance criteria.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Start with Cost per Accepted Part<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

A low cutting cost can be misleading when parts fail inspection or require extensive finishing. The more useful unit is the total process cost divided by the number of accepted parts produced in the same period.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Cost per accepted part<\/strong> = (wire + machine time + labor + utilities + fluid\/dust control + handling + inspection + rework + scrap allocation) \u00f7 accepted parts<\/p><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Use the same accounting boundary for the current method and the proposed process. Comparing only the new wire cost with the old blade cost, while excluding different cycle times or scrap rates, will produce an unreliable result.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Cost item<\/th>Calculation basis<\/th>Data required<\/th><\/tr><\/thead>
Wire consumption<\/strong><\/td>Verified wire cost allocated across accepted cuts or cutting length<\/td>Wire price, usable life, replacement reason and accepted output<\/td><\/tr>
Machine time<\/strong><\/td>Machine hourly ownership\/operating rate \u00d7 occupied time<\/td>Cut time, setup time, unloading time and hourly rate<\/td><\/tr>
Labor<\/strong><\/td>Direct operator time \u00d7 loaded labor rate<\/td>Hands-on setup, monitoring, handling and cleaning time<\/td><\/tr>
Utilities and process media<\/strong><\/td>Electricity, coolant, filtration, water treatment or dust collection per batch<\/td>Measured consumption, replacement interval and disposal cost<\/td><\/tr>
Material loss<\/strong><\/td>Kerf volume or mass \u00d7 material value<\/td>Actual kerf, cut length\/depth, density and material cost<\/td><\/tr>
Quality loss<\/strong><\/td>Inspection, rework and scrap cost allocated to accepted output<\/td>Yield, defect type, rework route and rejected-part value<\/td><\/tr>
Downtime<\/strong><\/td>Lost productive time \u00d7 relevant hourly contribution<\/td>Wire changes, maintenance, cleaning and unplanned interruption<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n
\"Circular
Cost evaluation should combine cutting performance, accepted yield, consumables and occupied machine time.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Wire Life and Consumable Cost<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Wire life should be measured under a defined process window. A loop removed because of coating wear, local damage, unstable tracking or a product change does not represent the same usable life. Record both the output and the reason for replacement.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

A practical wire-cost metric can be based on accepted cuts, total cutting area or engaged cutting length. The correct denominator depends on the production process. When workpieces vary significantly, cutting area and material grade usually provide better context than a simple count.<\/p>\n\n\n\n